Search form

Search form

APPLY
  • Prospective students

    LINKS

    • Welcome
    • Request Information
    • Apply Now
    • About OU Law
    • Admissions
    • Academics
    • Living in Norman
    • Contact
    • ABA Report
    Virtual tour image
    Request information
    (Opens in a new window)

    WELCOME

    • From President Boren

      “As a graduate of the OU College of Law, I challenge you to cherish and preserve the law passed on by earlier generations.”

    • From Dean Harroz

      “At OU Law, we have inspired and produced generations of excellence. Our students have left the halls of OU Law to go on to lead the state, nation and world in all areas of law.”

    • From Susan Wilson, Director

      “The support and personal attention OU Law gives its applicants, students and alumni are unsurpassed.”

    Apply Now

    FAST FACTS

    • Applicants in 2012: 980
    • Enrolled in 2012: 155
    • Median Undergrad GPA: 3.41
    • Median LSAT Score: 158
    Download the Campus Profile PDF View the Class Profile
  • Current Students

    LINKS

    • News & Events
    • Career Development
    • Academics
    • Courses
    • Students for Access to Justice
    • IT Services
    • Law Library
    • Student Intranet
    Virtual tour image

    CURRENT STUDENTS

    OU Law enrolls more than 500 students annually in its Juris Doctor (JD) and Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree programs. The John B. Turner LL.M. Program attracts students worldwide wishing to specialize in the college’s core areas: energy, natural resources and Native American law. Students also have the opportunity to earn joint degrees, travel abroad and gain practical experience through numerous clinics, competitions and legal publications at OU Law. They also provide valuable legal services to the public through the OU Legal Clinic and Students for Access to Justice.

    FAST FACTS

    • Total Students Enrolled : 509
    • Degree Programs : 37
    • Clinical Offerings: 6
    • Academic Publications: 3
    • Pro Bono Hours: 14,400
    Download the Campus Profile PDF View the Class Profile
  • Faculty / Staff

    LINKS

    • About
    • Faculty Scholarship
    • Faculty & Staff Directory
    • Academics
    • Courses
    • Law Library
    • Faculty & Staff Intranet
    • Faculty Support Office
    Virtual tour image

    FACULTY / STAFF

    The University of Oklahoma College of Law has retained an outstanding full-time law faculty to provide our students with an unequalled legal education experience. Combined with the numerous adjunct specialists who teach various subjects from the practitioner's point of view, we have assembled an exceptional instructional corps.

    FAST FACTS

    • Full-Time Faculty: 40
    • Endowed Faculty: 17
    • Adjunct Faculty: 34
    • Student-Faculty Ratio: 16:1
    Download the Campus Profile PDF View the Class Profile
  • Alumni / Donors

    LINKS

    • Welcome
    • Donate
    • Career Services
    • Sooner Lawyer
    • Alumni Directory
    Virtual tour image

    ALUMNI / DONORS

    • From Raegan King, Director

      We are so appreciative of the support OU College of Law receives from donors. Their support enhances our academic and scholarship programs, allowing OU Law to provide a quality legal education at a reasonable cost.

    • From Dean Harroz

      When I meet with alumni, I am always amazed to discover how many have never made it back to Norman.  While I encourage you to come tour the campus (you won’t believe the changes!), I am equally as eager to come visit you in your hometowns. I hope to see you at an upcoming alumni event.

    FAST FACTS

    • OU Law Alumni: 8,676
    • Facility Square Footage: 170,000
    • Year Founded: 1909
    Download the Campus Profile PDF View the Class Profile
  • Visitors

    LINKS

    • Schedule a Tour
    • Hire a Sooner Lawyer
    • Legal Assistance
    • Publications
    • Media
    • Galleries
    • Historical Documents
    • Contact
    Virtual tour image
    Request information
    (Opens in a new window)

    VISITORS

    The University of Oklahoma College of Law is one of our nation’s great public law schools. Founded in 1909, OU Law provides a dynamic intellectual community dedicated to teaching, learning, research and service in the pursuit of law and justice. OU Law delivers an exemplary legal education at an accessible cost to students and is consistently recognized as a “Best Value” law school by National Jurist magazine.

    Apply Now

    FAST FACTS

    • Average Student Age: 24.6
    • Percentage Minorities: 20
    • Percentage Men: 56
    • Percentage Women: 44
    Download the Campus Profile PDF View the Class Profile
  • LAW Library
  • OU HOME
  • LAW HOME
Home
▼ QUICK LINKS ▼
  • About ou law
  • Academic programs
  • Hire a Sooner Lawyer
  • Publications
  • Legal assistance
GIVE A GIFT
symbol
Current Students
  • News & Events
    • Bulletin Board
    • Law Calendar
    • Academic Calendar
  • Career Development
    • Student Services
      • Programs/Career Fairs
      • Job Placement
        • Recruiting
        • Externships
        • Internships
      • Resources/Tools
        • Work Samples
        • Career Development Timelines
        • Symplicity
    • Employer services
      • Recruiting
        • On-campus recruiting
        • Resume collection
      • Job Postings
    • Employment Statistics
    • Alumni Services
    • Reciprocity Policy
    • Contact
  • Academics
    • Academic programs
      • Juris doctor
        • Degree requirements
        • Courses
        • Writing requirement
        • Tuition and Fees
        • Dual Degrees
        • Combined Curriculum
        • Certificates
          • Business Entrepreneurship
          • American Indian Law
          • Energy Law
          • Natural Resources Law
      • Master of Laws
        • About
        • Admission Requirements
        • Apply Now
        • Financial Aid
        • Tuition and Fees
        • Degree/Course Requirements
        • Course descriptions
        • Contact
      • MASTER OF LEGAL STUDIES
        • Admission Requirements
        • Apply Now
        • Degree/Course Requirements
        • Financial Aid
        • TUITION AND FEES
        • Contact
      • Legal Assistant Education
        • Legal Assistant Career
        • Admission/Certificate Requirements
        • Application
        • Tuition and Fees
        • Course Information
          • Required Courses
          • Elective Courses
          • Course Materials
        • Sooner Docket
      • Native American Law
        • Native American law certificate
        • Joint degree
        • Native American law student association
        • Writing and publishing opportunities
        • Latin American fellows
        • Conferences
        • Courses
        • Native American Constitution and Law
      • Clinical offerings
        • Live client clinics
          • Civil
          • Criminal defense
          • Section 1983 litigation
        • Advocacy clinics
        • Externships
          • Placement opportunities
            • Judicial
            • Government / non-profit
            • Mediation training
            • Finding a placement
            • Current opportunities
        • Licensed legal internship
          • Requirements
          • Licensed legal intern exam
      • Oxford summer program
        • Program details
        • Admission requirements
        • Courses
        • Faculty
        • Tuition, Fees, & Costs
        • Disclosures
      • Chinese Law Summer Program
        • Courses
    • First-week assignments and course materials
      • Assignments Listed by Course
      • Assignments Listed by Professor
      • Required Course Materials
    • Awards
    • Academic Publications
      • Oklahoma law review
        • About
        • Masthead
        • Current issue
        • Future issue
        • Archives
          • Past mastheads
          • Past issues
        • Submissions
        • Subscriptions
        • Permission request
        • Symposium
        • Writers' Guidelines
      • American Indian law review
        • About
        • Masthead
        • Current issue
        • Future issue
        • Case Analysis
        • Peer review
        • Submissions
        • Subscriptions
        • Back Issues
        • Writers' guidelines
        • Writing competition
        • Symposium
      • Oklahoma Journal of Law and Technology
        • About
        • Current Publications
        • Publications By Volume
          • Vol. 1 (2003-2004)
          • Vol. 2 (2004-2005)
          • Vol. 3 (2006-2007)
          • Vol. 4 (2008)
          • Vol. 5 (2009)
          • Vol. 6 (2010)
          • Vol. 7 (2011)
        • Publications by Subject
          • Agricultural Biotechnology
          • Antitrust
          • Copyrights & Trademarks
          • Cybercrime
          • E-Commerce
          • Emerging Technologies
          • Media & Communications Technology
          • Patents & Technology
          • Special Features
        • OKJOLT Blog
        • MASTHEADS
          • Current Masthead
          • Masthead Archive
        • Submissions
        • Contact
    • Competitions and Advocacy
      • About the board of advocates
      • Traveling team competitions
      • In-school competitions
      • Awards
      • Judging opportunities
    • Academic calendar
  • Courses
  • Students for Access to Justice
    • Pro Bono Recognition
    • Career Resources
    • Fellowships and Funding
    • Pro Bono Programs
    • Rules of Professional Conduct
  • IT Services
    • Services
    • Classroom Technology
    • Computer Recommendations
    • Exams on Laptops
    • FAQs
    • For New Students
    • Intranet/Forums
    • Law Computer Labs
    • Law Student Network
  • Law Library
    • About
    • Research
      • Catalogs
      • Legal databases
      • OU Resources
      • Special Collections
    • Map and guides
    • Services
      • Student and Public Services
      • Faculty Services
    • Policies
    • Copyright
  • Student Intranet

Vol. 3 (2006-2007)

Click on link for PDF (opens in new window)

D. Ward Hobson, Jr., Reforming the Patent System:  A Closer Look at Proposed Legislation, 3 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 29 (2006)

This paper examines the purpose of the proposed reforms and their potential effect on the patent system.  Part II discusses whether the U.S. should adopt a first to file system.  Part III looks at the passage of questionable patents and the proposed post-grant review process.  Part IV examines whether prior art should be limited to information that is "reasonably and effectively accessible".  Part V addresses the duty of good faith and candor, and Part VI examines willful infringement and treble damages in patent litigation.


Elizabeth A. Richardson, Toward a Direct Functional Relationship Requirement for Claims to Software Encoded on a Computer-Readable Storage Medium: Rethinking In re Beauregard in Response to the USPTO’s Interim Guidelines Regarding the Patentability of Data Signal Claims, 3 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 30 (2006)

As applied to software-related inventions, one of the most difficult and persistent issues in patent law is the appropriate scope of 35 U.S.C. § 101, which defines patentable subject matter. Specifically, the law remains unsettled as to whether claims to computer-readable media containing software (often called “Beauregard-type” or “floppy disk” claims) and claims to data signals embodied on carrier waves fall within the scope of § 101 as a general matter. Achieving final resolution of this question has important implications not only for patent law but for a wide swath of the information technology industry, as electronic distribution becomes an increasingly attractive means for dissemination of software. This paper explores the patentability of these Beauregard-type stored software claims under §§ 101 – 103 of the Patent Act through examination of several key Federal Circuit cases and policies of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.


Felix W.H. Chan, E-commerce All at Sea:  China Welcomes Digital Bills of Lading Under the Electronic Signature Law 2005, 3 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 31 (2006)

As applied to software-related inventions, one of the most difficult and persistent issues in patent law is the appropriate scope of 35 U.S.C. § 101, which defines patentable subject matter. Specifically, the law remains unsettled as to whether claims to computer-readable media containing software (often called “Beauregard-type” or “floppy disk” claims) and claims to data signals embodied on carrier waves fall within the scope of § 101 as a general matter. Achieving final resolution of this question has important implications not only for patent law but for a wide swath of the information technology industry, as electronic distribution becomes an increasingly attractive means for dissemination of software. This paper explores the patentability of these Beauregard-type stored software claims under §§ 101 – 103 of the Patent Act through examination of several key Federal Circuit cases and policies of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.


Ryan J. Reeves, The Dangers of E-Discovery and the New Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 3 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 32 (2007)

As applied to software-related inventions, one of the most difficult and persistent issues in patent law is the appropriate scope of 35 U.S.C. § 101, which defines patentable subject matter. Specifically, the law remains unsettled as to whether claims to computer-readable media containing software (often called “Beauregard-type” or “floppy disk” claims) and claims to data signals embodied on carrier waves fall within the scope of § 101 as a general matter. Achieving final resolution of this question has important implications not only for patent law but for a wide swath of the information technology industry, as electronic distribution becomes an increasingly attractive means for dissemination of software. This paper explores the patentability of these Beauregard-type stored software claims under §§ 101 – 103 of the Patent Act through examination of several key Federal Circuit cases and policies of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.


Michael Betts, Plunging into the Information Age:  The Effect of Current Competition Policy on United States Science and Technology Policy, 3 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 33 (2007)

"Human civilization is on the brink of a new revolution.  No longer can one simply create commodities faster and cheaper and expect to come out ahead.  Instead, winners of the global scramble for economic supremacy will be those who develop talent, techniques, and tools so advanced that there is no competition.  To better cope with these aims of the new Information Age and maintain its global technological preeminence, the United States must actively pursue its Science and Technology Policy (S&T policy).  However, the question is whether current competition policy, under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, remains valid when one strives to foster innovative industries.  In other words, can the goals of S&T policy in the United States be effectively pursued in the face of current antitrust law?"


Michael Betts, Standardization in Information Technology Industries:  Emerging Issues Under Section Two of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 3 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 34 (2007)

"The e-Brief Plunging into the Information Age: The Effect of Current Competition Policy on United States Science and Technology Policy discussed whether the United States could effectuate its Science and Technology Policy (S&T Policy) in the face of antitrust regulation.  Its focus was on the United States' emphasis on strengthening its Information Technology (IT) industry and the problems antitrust regulation may pose to the industry.  However, the scope of the inquiry was limited to Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (Section 1).  A thorough analysis led to the conclusion that Section 1 afforded enough flexibility to promote, rather than hinder, the unabashed pursuit of United States S&T Policy.  The purpose of this e-Brief is to expand the scope by introducing possible implications of Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (Section 2) given the nature of competition in IT industries."


Michael Betts, United States Versus Microsoft: A Case Study, 3 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 35 (2007)

Mr. Betts provides the final article of his three-part series. This article follows his second part, Standardization in Information Technology Industries: Emerging Issues under Section Two of the Sherman Antitrust Act, where he introduced possible implications of Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, and explicated the only relevant issue raised by standards competition in IT industries. That is, whether the winning firm has abused its power to maintain the monopoly. Refer to 3 Okla. J.L. & Tech. 34 (2007) for a full copy of Standardization in Information Technology Industries. Here, Mr. Betts analyzes this issue in the context of United States v. Microsoft Corp., 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001).


Robert Malone, Health Information Technology:  Transforming the Healthcare Industry for the 21st Century, 3 OKLA. J.L. TECH. 36 (2007)

Mr. Malone begins the first of a three-part series of articles discussing Health Information Technology.  Here, he considers the effects Health Information Technology could have on the healthcare industry taken as a whole.  He focuses on the benefits this technology could have in improving and streamlining the provision of healthcare services.  Mr. Malone concludes that in an industry experiencing soaring costs and increasing levels of inefficiency, Health Information Technology could be an effective remedy.


Robert Malone, Health Information Technology and HIPAA:  Can We Satisfy Security and Privacy Standards in the Digital Age?, 3 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 37 (2007)

Mr. Malone expands upon his previous publication, Health Information Technology: Transforming the Healthcare Industry for the 21st Century, in which he considered the effects such technology could have on the problems currently plaguing the industry.  Refer to 3 Okla. J.L. & Tech. 36 for a full copy of Health Information Technology.  Here, Mr. Malone considers whether this technology can co-exist with HIPAA and its concerns regarding privacy over sensitive health records.  Mr. Malone concludes that the benefits of Health Information Technology outweigh any risks related to HIPAA, and that the technology could in fact aid HIPAA through better enforcement of its provisions.


Robert Malone, Health Information Technology, E-Prescribing and Hurricane Katrina:  Could Electronic Health Records Have Made a Difference?, 3 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 38 (2007)

Mr. Malone concludes his three-part series on Health Information Technology. This article follows the second installment, entitled Health Information Technology and HIPAA: Can We Satisfy Security and Privacy Standards in the Digital Age?  In that article he considered whether this technology can co-exist with HIPAA and its concerns regarding privacy over sensitive health records.  Refer to 3 Okla. J.L. & Tech. 36 and 3 Okla. J.L. & Tech. 37 for a full copy of the first two parts in this series.  Here, Mr. Malone considers the possible benefits of employing this technology, specifically "E-Prescribing," in a situation such as the one confronted in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.  Mr. Malone concludes that disasters such as hurricanes show how poorly equipped the healthcare industry is to handle catastrophic situations and how valuable Health Information Technology could have been.






facebook twitter
  • About ou law
  • Law Calendar
  • Accessibility
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy

The University of Oklahoma College of Law | 300 Timberdell Road, Norman, Oklahoma 73019 | Updated 08/28/12 | Copyright © 2011

The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, All rights Reserved | The University of Oklahoma is an Equal Opportunity Employer.