Search form

Search form

APPLY
  • Prospective students

    LINKS

    • Welcome
    • Request Information
    • Apply Now
    • About OU Law
    • Admissions
    • Academics
    • Living in Norman
    • Contact
    • ABA Report
    Virtual tour image
    Request information
    (Opens in a new window)

    WELCOME

    • From President Boren

      “As a graduate of the OU College of Law, I challenge you to cherish and preserve the law passed on by earlier generations.”

    • From Dean Harroz

      “At OU Law, we have inspired and produced generations of excellence. Our students have left the halls of OU Law to go on to lead the state, nation and world in all areas of law.”

    • From Susan Wilson, Director

      “The support and personal attention OU Law gives its applicants, students and alumni are unsurpassed.”

    Apply Now

    FAST FACTS

    • Applicants in 2012: 980
    • Enrolled in 2012: 155
    • Median Undergrad GPA: 3.41
    • Median LSAT Score: 158
    Download the Campus Profile PDF View the Class Profile
  • Current Students

    LINKS

    • News & Events
    • Career Development
    • Academics
    • Courses
    • Students for Access to Justice
    • IT Services
    • Law Library
    • Student Intranet
    Virtual tour image

    CURRENT STUDENTS

    OU Law enrolls more than 500 students annually in its Juris Doctor (JD) and Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree programs. The John B. Turner LL.M. Program attracts students worldwide wishing to specialize in the college’s core areas: energy, natural resources and Native American law. Students also have the opportunity to earn joint degrees, travel abroad and gain practical experience through numerous clinics, competitions and legal publications at OU Law. They also provide valuable legal services to the public through the OU Legal Clinic and Students for Access to Justice.

    FAST FACTS

    • Total Students Enrolled : 509
    • Degree Programs : 37
    • Clinical Offerings: 6
    • Academic Publications: 3
    • Pro Bono Hours: 14,400
    Download the Campus Profile PDF View the Class Profile
  • Faculty / Staff

    LINKS

    • About
    • Faculty Scholarship
    • Faculty & Staff Directory
    • Academics
    • Courses
    • Law Library
    • Faculty & Staff Intranet
    • Faculty Support Office
    Virtual tour image

    FACULTY / STAFF

    The University of Oklahoma College of Law has retained an outstanding full-time law faculty to provide our students with an unequalled legal education experience. Combined with the numerous adjunct specialists who teach various subjects from the practitioner's point of view, we have assembled an exceptional instructional corps.

    FAST FACTS

    • Full-Time Faculty: 40
    • Endowed Faculty: 17
    • Adjunct Faculty: 34
    • Student-Faculty Ratio: 16:1
    Download the Campus Profile PDF View the Class Profile
  • Alumni / Donors

    LINKS

    • Welcome
    • Donate
    • Career Services
    • Sooner Lawyer
    • Alumni Directory
    Virtual tour image

    ALUMNI / DONORS

    • From Raegan King, Director

      We are so appreciative of the support OU College of Law receives from donors. Their support enhances our academic and scholarship programs, allowing OU Law to provide a quality legal education at a reasonable cost.

    • From Dean Harroz

      When I meet with alumni, I am always amazed to discover how many have never made it back to Norman.  While I encourage you to come tour the campus (you won’t believe the changes!), I am equally as eager to come visit you in your hometowns. I hope to see you at an upcoming alumni event.

    FAST FACTS

    • OU Law Alumni: 8,676
    • Facility Square Footage: 170,000
    • Year Founded: 1909
    Download the Campus Profile PDF View the Class Profile
  • Visitors

    LINKS

    • Schedule a Tour
    • Hire a Sooner Lawyer
    • Legal Assistance
    • Publications
    • Media
    • Galleries
    • Historical Documents
    • Contact
    Virtual tour image
    Request information
    (Opens in a new window)

    VISITORS

    The University of Oklahoma College of Law is one of our nation’s great public law schools. Founded in 1909, OU Law provides a dynamic intellectual community dedicated to teaching, learning, research and service in the pursuit of law and justice. OU Law delivers an exemplary legal education at an accessible cost to students and is consistently recognized as a “Best Value” law school by National Jurist magazine.

    Apply Now

    FAST FACTS

    • Average Student Age: 24.6
    • Percentage Minorities: 20
    • Percentage Men: 56
    • Percentage Women: 44
    Download the Campus Profile PDF View the Class Profile
  • LAW Library
  • OU HOME
  • LAW HOME
Home
▼ QUICK LINKS ▼
  • About ou law
  • Academic programs
  • Hire a Sooner Lawyer
  • Publications
  • Legal assistance
GIVE A GIFT
symbol
Faculty / Staff
  • About
  • Faculty Scholarship
  • Faculty & Staff Directory
    • ADMINISTRATIVE FACULTY
    • TENURED / TENURE TRACK
    • NON-TENURE TRACK & VISITING
    • ADJUNCT FACULTY
    • EMERITUS FACULTY
    • STAFF
  • Academics
    • Academic Programs
      • Juris Doctor
        • Degree requirements
        • Courses
        • Writing Requirement
        • Tuition and Fees
        • Dual Degrees
        • Combined Curriculum
        • Certificates
          • Business Entrepreneurship
          • American Indian Law
          • Energy Law
          • Natural Resources Law
      • Master of Laws
        • About
        • Admission Requirements
        • Apply Now
        • Financial Aid
        • Tuition and Fees
        • Degree/Course Requirements
        • Course Descriptions
        • Contact
      • MASTER OF LEGAL STUDIES
        • Admission Requirements
        • Degree/Course Requirements
        • Financial Aid
        • TUITION AND FEES
        • Contact
      • Legal Assistant Education
        • Legal Assistant Career
        • Admission/Certificate Requirements
        • Application
        • Tuition and Fees
        • Course Information
          • Required Courses
          • Elective Courses
          • Course Materials
        • Sooner Docket
      • Native American Law
        • Native American Law Certificate
        • Joint Degree
        • Native American Law Student Association
        • Writing and Publishing Opportunities
        • Latin American Fellows
        • Conferences
        • Courses
        • Native American Constitution and Law
      • Clinical Offerings
        • Live Client Clinics
          • Civil
          • Criminal Defense
          • Section 1983 Litigation
        • Advocacy clinics
        • Externships
          • Placement opportunities
            • Judicial
            • Government / Non-Profit
            • Mediation Training
            • Finding a Placement
            • Current Opportunities
        • Licensed Legal Internship
          • Requirements
          • Licensed Legal Intern Exam
      • Oxford Summer Program
        • Program Details
        • Admission Requirements
        • Courses
        • Faculty
        • Disclosures
      • Chinese Law Summer Program
        • Courses
    • First-Week Assignments and Course Materials
      • Assignments Listed by Course
      • Assignments Listed by Professor
      • Required Course Materials
    • Awards
    • Academic Publications
      • Oklahoma Law Review
        • About
        • Masthead
        • Current Issue
        • Future Issue
        • Archives
          • Past mastheads
          • Past issues
        • Submissions
        • Subscriptions
        • Permission Request
        • Symposium
        • Writers' Guidelines
      • American Indian Law Review
        • About
        • Masthead
        • Current Issue
        • Future Issue
        • Case Analysis
        • Peer Review
        • Submissions
        • Subscriptions
        • Back Issues
        • Writers’ Guidelines
        • Writing Competition
        • Symposium
      • Oklahoma Journal of Law and Technology
        • About
        • Current Publications
        • Publications By Volume
          • Vol. 1 (2003-2004)
          • Vol. 2 (2004-2005)
          • Vol. 3 (2006-2007)
          • Vol. 4 (2008)
          • Vol. 5 (2009)
          • Vol. 6 (2010)
          • Vol. 7 (2011)
        • Publications by Subject
          • Agricultural Biotechnology
          • Antitrust
          • Copyrights & Trademarks
          • Cybercrime
          • E-Commerce
          • Emerging Technologies
          • Media & Communications Technology
          • Patents & Technology
          • Special Features
        • OKJOLT Blog
        • MASTHEADS
          • Current Masthead
          • Masthead Archive
        • Submissions
        • Contact
    • Competitions and Advocacy
      • About the Board of Advocates
      • Traveling team competitions
      • In-school competitions
      • Awards
      • Judging opportunities
    • Academic Calendar
  • Courses
  • Law Library
    • About
    • Research
      • Catalogs
      • Legal databases
      • OU resources
      • Special Collections
    • Map and guides
    • Services
      • Student and Public Services
      • Faculty Services
    • Policies
    • Copyright
  • Faculty & Staff Intranet
  • Faculty Support Office

Vol. 6 (2010)

Click link to view PDF (opens in new window)

Julie Elizabeth Myers, The Moment of Truth for fMRI:  Will Deception Detection Pass Admissibility Hurdles in Oklahoma?, 6 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 47 (2010)

"Functional magnetic resonance imaging, or fMRI, as a lie-detector is especially promising,   despite the fact that other forms of lie detection technology have been held inadmissible for over eighty years.   Although there is some debate over the exact accuracy of fMRI, to date, this technology has even demonstrated the ability to recognize a specific item - such as a screwdriver or a window - that a person is thinking of merely by reading the computerized images of that person’s brain activity.   Proponents claim the ability of fMRI technology to discern truth from deception will soon be absolute.  Case law on these advanced deception detection technologies is sparse at best, but the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals has had one of the few unique opportunities to  confront the early use of neuro-lie-detection evidence.   Because the Oklahoma Evidence Code parallels the Federal Rules of Evidence regarding expert testimony, an understanding of federal interpretation concerning novel science will be significant for fMRI evidence in Oklahoma.  In fact, early cases of neuro scanning evidence in Oklahoma may have great influence on the outcome of the battle over fMRI admissibility in many jurisdictions.  This comment will discuss fMRI and its chances at admissibility in Oklahoma courts and in the Tenth Circuit, which both follow the Daubert decision when evaluating novel scientific evidence, and propose an explanation of why it should be admitted as reliable."


Amanda Higgins, Not So Fast:  Quon v. Arch Wireless Is Not Employees' License to Text the Workday Away, 6 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 48 (2010)

"Last year, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided Quon v. Arch Wireless,  a case that had privacy advocates jumping for joy, but only because they were jumping the gun.  Many thought it was the beginning of a new level of privacy for employees in the workplace.  One CNET blogger insisted that the Quon decision meant that “employees’ text messages are now safe from their bosses’ prying eyes.”   Similarly, a newspaper headline shouted “Prying Bosses Get the Message,” going on to claim that the ruling would affect “all employers who contract with an outside provider for messages.”   “Bosses Can’t Read Employees’ Messages, Court Says” proclaimed a headline from Entrepreneur Information Management Journal in the Fall of 2008.    The same article goes on to quote from Newsweek in its conclusion that the Ninth Circuit’s ruling “means that Quon’s texts—and by proxy, millions of other messages from millions of other users—are protected from ‘employers prying eyes.’”   So many were eager to report that every employee was now free to message away at any time, without their boss reading those messages.  But these articles, in general, overstate the effect of the Quon decision, with some reactions in those early days being just plain wrong."


Wes Deweese, Fracturing Misconceptions:  A History of Effective State Regulation, Groundwater Protection, and the Ill-Conceived FRAC Act, 6 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 49 (2010)

"The hydraulic fracturing process is effectively regulated by states, but there are efforts being made in the U.S. Congress to bring its regulation under the purview of the Safe Drinking Water Act.   By attempting to regulate hydraulic fracturing under this Act, the federal government will only serve to impose costly regulatory hurdles that will inhibit the development of the United States’ vast reserves of natural gas trapped in shale and tight sand formations throughout the country.  This proposed regulation is a one-size-fits-all approach, unnecessarily transferring to the federal government the regulation of an industry practice that has been effectively regulated by states.  Each state has a vested interest in the protection of its natural environment.  To that end, they have been effectively regulating the oil and gas industry since the early twentieth century.  The additional hurdle proposed before Congress is unnecessary and lacks an understanding of the technology and regulation concerning the development of the nation’s indigenous hydrocarbon resources.  Further, in a hearing before the Senate Committee on Environmental and Public Works, representatives from the Environmental Protection Agency testified that they had not heard of one case of ground water contamination due to hydraulic fracturing.   Imposing unnecessary federal regulations on a process that has a sixty-year history of effective state regulation would cause much of the domestic energy supply to remain unproduced, further increasing U.S. dependence on foreign sources of oil and natural gas.  As US gas is developed, LNG and pipeline imports will decline."


Todd E, Saucedo, The Quandary of Being Interactive:  The Impact of Arista Records v. Launch Media on the Viability of Webcasting Services, 6 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 50 (2010)

"The advent of the Internet helped spawn an age of user based interactivity that brought forth a new venue for the public performance of sound recordings, and with it a whole new set of complexities and questions for the recording industry and the holders of copyrights. Adding a further layer to the query, various methods and means came into use that allowed the transfer and streaming of music in ways that had been unimaginable to both the recording industry and to lawmakers just a decade prior. . . . Beyond mere peer to peer file sharing, another concern that caught the attention of the record industry was that of “streaming audio,” or “webcasting.” Streaming allows an Internet user to listen to music via the web without having to download and permanently store audio files onto their computers, essentially giving the listener access to whatever is playing on that station at that moment.  A basic summation of webcasting is that “audio is transmitted over the Internet bit by bit, but never as a complete file,” thus preventing a “listener from record[ing] or sav[ing] a copy of the audio file.”  The recording industry became increasingly concerned that the traditional balance that had existed between radio broadcasters and themselves would be disturbed, and that consumers would find alternative avenues to purchase music or at least find ways to circumvent the entire process of purchasing that would extract the recording industry’s products and “thus erode sales of recorded music.”  Webcast streaming has evolved in different stages, resulting in several attempts by Congress, through multiple amendments to the Copyright Act of 1976, to categorize and more narrowly define the limitations of web streaming and its applications to copyright law."


Kristin Decker, Looking for Lagniappe:  Publicity as a Culprit to Social Networking Websites, 6 OKLA. J.L. & TECH. 51 (2010)

"Yath v. Fairview Clinics exemplifies a situation of concern for both a MySpace user who posted another’s private information on the internet and Minnesota courts, which are in debate over the proper way to apply the publicity element in an invasion of privacy claim.  Courts routinely analyze publicity by first designating a medium of communication as either private or public.  Though suitable for earlier approaches to mass communication, this approach is much too broad for assessment of the internet, and more specifically, networking sites. In the past, mass communication was essentially an exclusive monopoly dominated by professional news sources, like the New Yorker and the Times-Picayune.  However, networking sites are allowing the general public to effortlessly access an infinite amount of people without possessing the awareness of possible legal consequences, a quality alternatively inherent in specialty news sources.  To designate all networking sites as strictly public mediums of communication would be to ignore the intrinsic features of a networking site availing to its users the ability to determine the extent of information released into cyberspace. Moreover, a purely private characterization of networking sites would overlook the immeasurable impact of a website void of restrictive safeguards."


facebook twitter
  • About ou law
  • Law Calendar
  • Accessibility
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy

The University of Oklahoma College of Law | 300 Timberdell Road, Norman, Oklahoma 73019 | Updated 08/31/12 | Copyright © 2011

The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma, All rights Reserved | The University of Oklahoma is an Equal Opportunity Employer.